Dive Deeper Into this Conversation
Catch our interview with Todd Harrison, co-chair of the FDA practice group at Venable LLP, to unpack what the bill actually does, and where it falls short.
A year-to-date look at the federal and state measures shaping supplement oversight, access, and classification.
Legislative activity affecting the nutraceutical industry has continued through the first three quarters of 2026, spanning product registration, federal oversight, state age restrictions, hemp, tax treatment, and drug preclusion. This roundup presents Nutritional Outlook coverage year to date, showing lawmakers taking different approaches, with trade associations often divided on details.
At the start of the year, Sen. Dick Durbin reintroduced the
Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN; Washington, D.C.) supported the bill, while Natural Products Association (NPA; Washington, D.C.) opposed it, citing administrative burden and higher costs.
On February 4, Rep. Nick Langworthy introduced the
Rep. Maxine Dexter introduced a House version of the
Sens. Kevin Cramer and John Curtis introduced the
Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed
On September 1,
Catch our interview with Todd Harrison, co-chair of the FDA practice group at Venable LLP, to unpack what the bill actually does, and where it falls short.
On September 10, Rep. Diana Harshbarger introduced the
States have enacted measures on minors' access, tincture classification, and hemp, while the federal bills covered here remain at the introduction stage. Trade groups have aligned on preemption and preclusion reform but split on product listing, and hemp regulations remain unresolved.
References






